Ho Chi Minh City vs Wuhan — Livability Comparison
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam and Wuhan, China compared across livability metrics on WellPlaced, from World Bank, WHO, OECD, UNESCO, UNODC, Eurostat, Ookla Speedtest, OpenAQ, and GDELT institutional data (not crowdsourced). Overall, Wuhan ranks higher (70/100 vs 71/100).
Ho Chi Minh City vs Wuhan, metric by metric
| Metric | Ho Chi Minh City | Wuhan | Higher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety & Security | 81/100 | 70/100 | Ho Chi Minh City |
| Daily Living Costs | 93/100 | 88/100 | Ho Chi Minh City |
| Housing & Rent | 100/100 | 99/100 | Ho Chi Minh City |
| Healthcare | 72/100 | 83/100 | Wuhan |
| Economy & Jobs | 76/100 | 80/100 | Wuhan |
| Education | 75/100 | 77/100 | Wuhan |
| Transport | 78/100 | 84/100 | Wuhan |
Compare all 29 metrics (climate, air quality, tax burden, governance, and more) side by side with WellPlaced PRO.